netplex. Early Access is open - join the list to get in first.
netplex./Alternatives/vs Containerlab
Containerlab alternative Keep your .clab.yml Visual + CLI VMs without vrnetlab

Containerlab, with a canvas.
Same YAML. Now in your browser.

Containerlab is the cleanest way to spin up container-native labs from the CLI - and netplex. isn't here to argue with that. It speaks the same YAML and the same lab-as-code workflow, then adds what a CLI can't: a visual canvas, real vendor VMs without the vrnetlab dance, access from any browser on any OS, and real multi-user. Keep your pipeline. Give your team a GUI.

Get netplex. free See the comparison

Containerlab is CLI-and-YAML by design - brilliant for automation engineers, still a climb for everyone else on the team. Its own docs point you to hand-written topology files, and a graphical editor (TopoViewer, bundled in the official VS Code extension) can now edit that YAML visually - real progress, but it still means installing VS Code plus an extension, tied to one person's editor, not a browser link a whole team can open. netplex. keeps the YAML and the CLI and puts a live canvas in front of them from day one, in any browser - so the juniors, the students and the network architect can all build, not just the scripters.

Where Containerlab makes you work

A great tool - if you live in the CLI.
Not everyone does.

Friction 01

The canvas lives inside an IDE, not a browser

Every topology starts as a hand-written .clab.yml: nodes, kinds, endpoints, link lists. TopoViewer, bundled in the official VS Code extension, now edits that visually - drag nodes, wire links, inspect interfaces, a real graphical editor, not a bolt-on. But it's a VS Code webview: onboarding anyone who isn't fluent in the schema still means installing VS Code and an extension first, and there's no real-time co-editing or a link you can just send someone.

Friction 02

Vendor VMs mean the vrnetlab dance

Containers are effortless. Real vendor VMs - vMX, vSRX, CSR, XRv - are not: each one is a vrnetlab image you build yourself with per-image make, a compatibility matrix, 3-25 minute boots, and labs that balloon toward 48 GB.

vrnetlab wraps qcow2 VMs into containers across 30+ kinds - powerful, but every image is a build step before your first boot.
Friction 03

Linux + Docker on your machine

Containerlab runs where Docker/Podman runs - a Linux host. macOS and Windows are second-class: the WSL2 dance, ARM64 image gaps on Apple Silicon, and no tc traffic-control inside Docker Desktop for link impairments.

Friction 04

Single-user by nature

Containerlab is a CLI tool, so access is host access. Membership of the root-equivalent clab_admins group runs labs - there is no built-in login, no per-user RBAC, no teams or quotas. Sharing a host between a class or a team is a manual, trust-everyone affair.

Friction 05

No classroom model

There is no student pod, no per-learner isolation, no grading. Teaching 25 people with Containerlab means 25 Linux boxes with Docker, or one shared host where everyone can see and stop everyone else's nodes.

Friction 06

Consoles and capture live in VS Code, not a browser

The official VS Code extension does bundle node shell/SSH access and packet capture (via Wireshark or Edgeshark) into VS Code itself - genuinely one screen. But that screen is an IDE window on one person's machine, not a link your whole team can open in any browser.

Feature comparison

Containerlab vs netplex.
Same YAML. More ways in.

Feature comparison between Containerlab and netplex., covering topology authoring, vendor VM support, collaboration and automation.
Feature Containerlab
Free / open source
netplex.
Tier shown per row
Lab-as-code (YAML) Yes - the whole model Yes - .npx + YAML export
Deploy / destroy / inspect CLI Yes - clab deploy/destroy/inspect Yes - netplex CLI + Python SDK
Visual canvas editor TopoViewer (VS Code extension) - real editor, but needs VS Code installed; no browser-only access, no real-time co-edit Yes - full browser Studio, built in
Runs on your machine Linux + Docker/Podman required Nothing local - any browser
macOS / Windows / Apple Silicon Second-class (WSL2, ARM64 gaps) First-class - thin client
Container nodes Yes - native, its core strength Yes - any Docker image
Full vendor VMs (vMX, vSRX, CSR…) vrnetlab - build each image, 3-25 min boots Drop a qcow2 → vendor profile auto-applied
Import existing vrnetlab container images Native, any of the 30+ wrapped kinds A curated set natively (e.g. MikroTik CHR) - outside that, bring the qcow2, run via QEMU
Import your .clab.yml topology - Yes - via the netplex CLI / API
Link impairment: delay / jitter / loss / rate Yes - tc / netem Yes - all tiers (netem)
Packet corruption impairment Yes Not yet
CI/CD integration Yes - run the CLI in CI netplex test - GitHub / GitLab actions
AI agent access (MCP) No Professional · beta
Multi-host distributed fabric No - bring your own orchestration Architect · beta
Multi-user / RBAC / teams / quotas CLI itself is single-user; an optional add-on server bolts on PAM login + 2 roles Not currently offered
Education / student pods / grading Not built in Not currently offered
Browser consoles + packet capture Via VS Code extension (shell + Wireshark/Edgeshark), or docker exec/SSH + host tcpdump Browser-native - no install

Containerlab facts from containerlab.dev docs, the srl-labs/vscode-containerlab extension docs and vrnetlab (July 2026); netplex. rows are code-verified against the platform source (parity audit, July 2026). Rows where Containerlab leads are marked honestly.

Keep your YAML. Get a canvas too.

Same lab-as-code workflow, plus a visual canvas and real vendor VMs without the vrnetlab dance.

Straight with you - where Containerlab still wins

If your images are already vrnetlab containers: netplex. does not import the general vrnetlab catalogue - most vendor VMs on netplex. skip vrnetlab entirely, running directly off the source qcow2 via QEMU with a vendor profile applied. A small, curated set of vrnetlab-wrapped images (currently MikroTik CHR, with more planned) is supported natively - the Library recognises them with their own filter and badge and launches them through Docker, console-in to the vendor OS inside. Outside that curated set, bring the source qcow2 instead. Containerlab also has a packet-corruption impairment knob that netplex. doesn't have yet (delay, jitter, loss and rate are all there). The official VS Code extension is a genuinely capable graphical editor now - drag-and-drop topology building, node templates, console access and packet capture, all inside VS Code - if your whole team already lives in that editor, it covers real ground. And if your entire workflow is `clab deploy` inside a CI runner and nothing else, Containerlab is already perfect - netplex. speaks the same YAML, so you lose nothing by keeping it there. Everything else on this page is live and verified against our source, not roadmap.

What netplex. adds on top

Keep the YAML. Add everything a CLI can't give a team.

netplex. is a server product, not a CLI tool - so the same lab-as-code you already write becomes something a browser, a classroom and a CI pipeline can all reach at once.

A canvas over your code

Build by dragging nodes and drawing links, or write .npx/YAML by hand - both are first-class and stay in sync. The people who love the CLI keep it; everyone else gets a picture they can edit.

Vendor VMs without vrnetlab

Drop a qcow2 into the Library and the image pipeline classifies it, applies the vendor's recommended CPU/RAM/NIC profile and boot-tests it. No per-image make, no compatibility matrix, no 48 GB container builds.

Any browser, any OS

The netplex. host runs the lab; every user drives it from a browser - Mac, Windows, Chromebook, Apple Silicon included. No local Docker, no WSL2, no ARM64 image hunt.

Import your .clab.yml

Point the netplex. CLI or API at an existing topology.clab.yml. Nodes, kinds, links and inline configs map to the .npx model; external config-file references are flagged so nothing goes missing silently.

An MCP server, not just a CLI

You automate with YAML today - now an AI agent can drive the same lab over MCP: list topologies, wire links, run commands, all through the same API your CI already hits. · beta

Scale beyond one machine

An orchestrator schedules your topology across as many worker hosts as you own, stitched together with encrypted VXLAN - the clustering Containerlab leaves to you. · roadmap, beta

Migration

Your topology file is already valid input.
Nothing to rewrite.

Step 01

Keep your .clab.yml

Your existing topology.clab.yml stays exactly as it is - it's the input, not something to convert by hand.

Step 02

Import via CLI or API

Point the netplex. CLI or REST API at the file. Kinds, nodes, links and inline configs map across; external file refs are flagged, not dropped.

Step 03

Drive it from a browser

Open the canvas, start the lab, console into any node and capture packets - with no Docker or Linux on your own machine.

Kinds mapped

Container kinds map to Docker nodes; vr-* kinds map to QEMU vendor types; bridge/ovs-bridge become switch nodes.

Inline configs carry

Startup config embedded inline in the topology imports as an active profile. External config-file paths are surfaced as warnings.

EVE-NG and GNS3 too

The same importer family handles EVE-NG .unl and GNS3 .gns3project - consolidate every lab format into one platform.

Questions

Containerlab to netplex.
The questions people actually ask.

Migrating your .clab.yml
Do I need to rewrite my .clab.yml to use netplex.?
No - it stays exactly as it is; it's the input, not something to convert by hand. Point the netplex. CLI or REST API at the file and kinds, nodes, links and inline configs map across automatically. External config-file references are flagged as warnings, not silently dropped.
Can I still use the CLI, or do I have to use the visual canvas?
Both are first-class and stay in sync - the netplex. CLI and Python SDK cover the same deploy/destroy/inspect workflow as clab, and the browser canvas edits the same topology. Keep the CLI if that's how you already work.
Do I need Linux and Docker on my own machine, like Containerlab requires?
No - nothing local, any browser. Containerlab runs where Docker/Podman runs, which makes macOS and Windows second-class (WSL2, ARM64 image gaps). netplex. runs the lab on the host; you drive it from a thin browser client on any OS.
Where each tool wins
Does netplex. support the full vrnetlab image catalogue?
Not the general catalogue - that's a real Containerlab strength. netplex. natively supports a small, curated set of vrnetlab-wrapped images (currently MikroTik CHR, more planned). Outside that set, most vendor VMs on netplex. skip vrnetlab entirely and run directly off the source qcow2 via QEMU with a vendor profile auto-applied.
Does netplex. support packet corruption impairment like Containerlab?
Not yet - that's one place Containerlab still leads. Delay, jitter, loss and rate impairment are all available on netplex. (Architect tier, netem + OVS); packet corruption specifically isn't implemented yet.
Is netplex. multi-user, unlike Containerlab's CLI model?
Yes - auth, RBAC and quotas on the Team tier. Containerlab's CLI itself is single-user (access runs through membership of the root-equivalent clab_admins group); an optional add-on server bolts on login plus two roles.

Last reviewed September 2026 · Spotted something out of date? Tell us.

Keep the CLI you love.
Give the lab a front door.

Start on the free Associate tier. Import a .clab.yml, open the canvas, and hand your team a browser link instead of a Docker setup guide.

Get netplex. free See the full product

Australian schools get the full platform free - install and teacher training included. Learn more →